To get a more comparable solution from Kaspersky, you’d have to go with EDR and KATA. Kaspersky also gets modestly higher scores for ease of use, but we’ll temper that by noting that both companies have some of the highest user ratings in the endpoint protection market, scoring 4.8 and above on Gartner’s 5-point scale.īitdefender users are very enthusiastic about the product’s security capabilities, as both the NSS Labs and MITRE data would suggest. In one little data oddity, Gartner Peer Reviews give Kaspersky higher marks for ease of deployment, but Bitdefender customers report modestly better implementation times. Kaspersky generally gets higher marks for ease of use and deployment, but Bitdefender has its fans too. In a 2019 total cost of ownership (TCO) study, NSS Labs said Bitdefender had a lower cost per incident than Kaspersky, so Bitdefender customers do get something for the higher cost. Kaspersky offers EDR and Anti Targeted Attack (KATA) solutions for more advanced security operations centers (SOCs).īitdefender also offers automated response capabilities, and while it doesn’t offer the guided investigation and custom rules an SOC might want, it offers enough advanced features like vulnerability management to appeal to enterprises. Kaspersky is heavily focused on automation, which makes it a great product for small and midsize businesses that don’t have the expertise for sophisticated incident response and analyst work. Here’s another area that differentiates the two security vendors. With security teams overwhelmed and stress levels high, that shouldn’t be too surprising. They want the product with the best response capabilities to help them clean up the inevitable breaches. IT security buyers don’t always want the product with the best raw security scores. In the very difficult MITRE testing, which mimics a Russian state-sponsored cyber attack, Bitdefender performed considerably better, stopping 82% of attacks, while Kaspersky stopped about half of attacks, in our analysis of the results.īoth companies have impressive threat research and R&D teams, so expect both to improve from any testing, but for organizations that might face a determined state-sponsored attack, Bitdefender would appear to be the better choice. Bitdefender received an A and a 600 score. NSS Labs gave Kaspersky a AA rating and a 695 total score, good for third place in the rigorous testing. So what do EDR/EPP buyers get for their money with Kaspersky and Bitdefender? For starters, both have impressive security. Pricing for your particular needs and configuration may differ, so always get multiple quotes when considering any IT purchase. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business was the second-least expensive at $73,250, with only Fortinet FortiClient costing less. Of 11 products tested in NSS Labs’ Advanced Endpoint Protection comparison published earlier this year, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra was the most expensive, with a three-year price of $291,575 for 2,500 endpoints. Pricing is the biggest difference between Kaspersky and Bitdefender. They offer comparably priced antivirus software with similar features, but when it comes to enterprise EDR and endpoint protection, they differ considerably. Kaspersky and Bitdefender have very good endpoint security products for both business and consumer users, so they made both our top EDR and top antivirus product lists.īuyers often compare the two. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. ESecurity Planet content and product recommendations are editorially independent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |